by daveesq » Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:22 pm
I'd have to disagree with this simply because potential customers (e.g., me) would very much like to see what actual customers (i.e., regular users) of the Solaris have to say about it, what problems they come across, and what they create with it.
I fully understand the spammer problem, but I think that the atmosphere created by Mr. Bowen's openness throughout the development process would suffer from a "members only" forum. In my mind, the most reasonable solution is simply good policing of what goes on, which has proved to be the case thus far.
David
I'd have to disagree with this simply because potential customers (e.g., me) would very much like to see what actual customers (i.e., regular users) of the Solaris have to say about it, what problems they come across, and what they create with it.
I fully understand the spammer problem, but I think that the atmosphere created by Mr. Bowen's openness throughout the development process would suffer from a "members only" forum. In my mind, the most reasonable solution is simply good policing of what goes on, which has proved to be the case thus far.
David