John,
Glad to hear this is coming out but just FYI there is no link on the owner portal to the V2.2.0 OS file or an addendum if one has been created to document the new features/changes.
Search found 40 matches
- Thu Dec 19, 2024 10:15 am
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: v2.2 OS released!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12910
- Tue Oct 04, 2022 10:49 am
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: Sample pools in OS 2.x
- Replies: 10
- Views: 34741
Re: Sample pools in OS 2.x
Oh, and last thing is to be able to handle stereo sample files. Kluging up a solution with panning multiple oscillators is a bit odd and inconvenient not to mention, as you have, the phasing issues that might arise.
- Tue Oct 04, 2022 10:47 am
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: Sample pools in OS 2.x
- Replies: 10
- Views: 34741
Re: Sample pools in OS 2.x
Thanks for the helpful response. A few comments....I don't understand why the engineer that coded the audio file handling couldn't just take the wav files and strip the metadata out in the code and then play it. It is certainly straightforward and there are numerous public domain code resources ...
- Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:04 pm
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: Sample pools in OS 2.x
- Replies: 10
- Views: 34741
Re: Sample pools in OS 2.x
John,
I have been testing some sample and sample pool files from Garth at Chicken Systems. I really hadn't used the sample pool functionality before but now having gotten a lot more exposure, I have a few observations of my own.
You had mentioned enhancing the software to actually use sample pools ...
I have been testing some sample and sample pool files from Garth at Chicken Systems. I really hadn't used the sample pool functionality before but now having gotten a lot more exposure, I have a few observations of my own.
You had mentioned enhancing the software to actually use sample pools ...
- Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:22 am
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: Sample pools in OS 2.x
- Replies: 10
- Views: 34741
Re: Sample pools in OS 2.x
I don't know why my last reply posted up as "guest." I guess I forgot to login. Garth from Chicken Systems is going to be working on getting this functioning properly and I have volunteered to test stuff he comes up with on my Solaris so we shall see how it goes.
- Sat Oct 01, 2022 7:19 pm
- Forum: Owners General Discussion
- Topic: Sample pools in OS 2.x
- Replies: 10
- Views: 34741
Sample pools in OS 2.x
I am now completely confused about how to load up sample pools in 2.0.3 OS version. Sample pools are supposedly global so they don't apply to each part. All well and good but now there doesn't seem to be a way to enable sample pool loading and selecting the sample pool for your oscillators.
This is ...
This is ...
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:55 am
- Forum: User Guides
- Topic: Revised Solaris User Guide now available v1.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 55401
Re: Revised Solaris User Guide now available v1.1
How is the new manual going John?
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:28 am
- Forum: OS Files
- Topic: OS v1.4.1 Update
- Replies: 11
- Views: 83716
Re: The hits keep on coming...Announcing the OS v1.4.1 Update!
Thanks John and Jim. That is just fantastic news. I am going to be playing with this today.
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:09 am
- Forum: User Feature Requests
- Topic: Developer Fund
- Replies: 137
- Views: 1748441
Re: Developer Fund
John Bowen wrote: Thu Mar 01, 2018 10:29 pmAre you going to prioritize development of 1U rack hardware above continuing OS development of the existing platform? I am sure I am not alone in hoping that doesn't happen.inaheartbeat wrote: Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:39 pm At what point are you going to make an initial proposal for the feature set and cost John?
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:06 am
- Forum: Solaris Discussion
- Topic: other Solaris hardware ideas
- Replies: 63
- Views: 861238
Re: other Solaris hardware ideas
John I would not assume that there are a lot of people regularly reading this forum. If you want to really gauge interest I would do a post on GS or Muffwiggler as well as sending an email out to all existing Solaris users. I am very interested in a Solaris expansion bit strained for cash right now ...
- Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:39 pm
- Forum: User Feature Requests
- Topic: Developer Fund
- Replies: 137
- Views: 1748441
Re: Developer Fund
At what point are you going to make an initial proposal for the feature set and cost John?
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:07 pm
- Forum: User Feature Requests
- Topic: Developer Fund
- Replies: 137
- Views: 1748441
Re: Developer Fund
John,
Lots of great ideas already here. Here is what I want:
multimode support - See the implementation of the Schmidt 8 voice polyphonic. I thought that was very well done. You could have 8 parts and you could allocate 1-8 voices per part. It allowed unison mode inside of multi patches also which ...
Lots of great ideas already here. Here is what I want:
multimode support - See the implementation of the Schmidt 8 voice polyphonic. I thought that was very well done. You could have 8 parts and you could allocate 1-8 voices per part. It allowed unison mode inside of multi patches also which ...
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:06 pm
- Forum: User Feature Requests
- Topic: Developer Fund
- Replies: 137
- Views: 1748441
Re: Developer Fund
Yea, we don’t really want to have two code bases to keep up. As for a licensing scheme - the Solaris has internal code that allows for secure operating system management, so that someone who didn’t pay for the upgrade would not be able to use the OS.
So if you agree with me that you don't want ...
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:55 pm
- Forum: User Feature Requests
- Topic: Developer Fund
- Replies: 137
- Views: 1748441
Re: Developer Fund
Just tripped over this thread so I apologize in advance if I post a bunch of replies instead of one lengthy one. I absolutely would contribute $200 to this effort.
Regarding separate versions of the OS for those that contribute to this effort and those that don't, I am a software engineer by ...
Regarding separate versions of the OS for those that contribute to this effort and those that don't, I am a software engineer by ...
- Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:23 pm
- Forum: Solaris bug reports
- Topic: MidiCtrl defaults to off in 1.4.2. Should be on
- Replies: 1
- Views: 21954
MidiCtrl defaults to off in 1.4.2. Should be on
John,
I upgraded my Solaris from 1.3 to 1.4.2 (which is overall great by the way....) and discovered it stopped working as a controller keyboard for my Parva. I used Midi-Ox to verify that no midi was being sent. It turned out that the MidiCtrl parameter was off when it should have been on. I have ...
I upgraded my Solaris from 1.3 to 1.4.2 (which is overall great by the way....) and discovered it stopped working as a controller keyboard for my Parva. I used Midi-Ox to verify that no midi was being sent. It turned out that the MidiCtrl parameter was off when it should have been on. I have ...